SHOPPING CART 
No items in cart.
|
Interconnection Of Balanced And Unbalanced Equipment Jensen AN-003
Interconnection Of Balanced And Unbalanced EquipmentTechniques for interconnecting balanced and unbalanced equipment
in audio systems seems to be a murky topic for many users,
technicians, and system designers. It is the subject of numerous calls
to our applications engineers. Confusion, and even controversy, is
further fueled by some published “guides” whose engineering basis
is dubious, at best. This paper briefly explains the hardware, some
underlying engineering theory, and includes wiring diagrams for
interfaces that solve many typical system problems.
1 - “UNBALANCED” and “BALANCED”
What do these terms really mean? Since I have previously written about the subject of balanced lines in some detail, I will just summarize the most important points here. Balance is defined in terms of the impedances of the two signal conductors with respect to a reference, which is usually “ground”.
An UNBALANCED input or output connects one of its signal conductors to ground and has a non-zero impedance at the other signal conductor. Unbalanced inputs and outputs are very popular in consumer electronics, electronic musical instruments, and low cost (often called “semi-pro”) audio equipment. Examples of typical circuits are shown below.
Figure 1: Typical Unbalanced Input
Usual values for RL are 10 kS to 100 kS, regardless of the equipment type. It is RL that effectively determines the input impedance of the circuit.
Figure 2: Typical Unbalanced Output
Usual values for RS are 330 S to 1 kS and for CC are 4.7 µF to
47 µF in consumer and musical instrument equipment, often
specified to drive a 10 kS minimum load. In Semi-pro audio
equipment, often specified to drive a 600 S minimum load, RS is
usually 47 S to 220 S and CC is 47 µF to 220 µF.
The inherent weakness of unbalanced interconnections is that the
shield, which is also a signal conductor, is a path for power line
related currents that always flow between equipment grounds. The
voltage drop across the resistance of the shield and connectors adds
directly to the signal, producing the familiar hum and buzz.
A BALANCED input or output uses two signal conductors which have equal impedances to ground. Balanced inputs and outputs are widely used in professional equipment because the input differential amplifier can, in theory at least, totally null its response to ground noise which exists equally on both signal lines. Examples of typical circuits are shown below.
Figure 3: Typical Balanced Input
Because of its low cost and small size, this “active balanced”
differential input circuit (or some variation of it) is very widely used.
The pairs of 10 kS resistors are trimmed to match within 0.01% in
order to null response to ground noise. When used in real-world
systems, however, a major drawback of this circuit is its exquisite
sensitivity to unbalances in the output (source) impedances of the
line driver. This seriously compromises ground noise rejection or
CMRR (Common-Mode Rejection Ratio) of the system.
Figure 4: Typical Balanced Output
This output circuit provides two equal amplitude but opposite polarity (symmetrical) signals and equal output (source) impedances to the lines. Values for RS and CC are generally in the same range as those for semi-pro equipment and tolerances are typically ±5% for RS and ±20% for CC. Although the balance of these (source) impedances strongly control system CMRR performance, especially when used with active balanced inputs, few equipment makers seem to recognize its importance. The signal symmetry of this, or any other, balanced line driver has nothing to do with ground noise rejection.
2 - UNBALANCED to BALANCED INTERFACES
The interfaces on the following page do NOT provide the 12 dB gain
necessary to raise the nominal !10 dBV (316 mV RMS) “consumer”
reference level to the nominal +4 dBu (1.23 V RMS) “pro” reference
level. If the pro equipment doesnt have enough gain “reach”, an
active interface may be necessary. A step-up transformer, even an
ideal lossless one, is not a viable source of gain in this application.
Reflected impedances cause excess level losses and compromise
both low frequency response and distortion.
Jensen AN-003 1
2 - UNBALANCED to BALANCED INTERFACES (cont'd)
For the applications below, cables should be high quality shielded twisted pair and, to prevent high frequency losses, no more than 1000 pF total capacitance. This is about 20 feet for standard types.
In all cases, unbalanced semi-pro outputs, which generally have lower RS and higher CC values, will typically improve ground noise rejection (CMRR) by several dB.
Figure 5: "MINIMAL" is an Adapter Cable
This interface is sometimes called a “pseudo-balanced” direct
connection. Chassis ground currents flow in the shield of the cable
and the balanced input senses the signal at the unbalanced output
connector. This theoretically allows the differential input stage to
reject the common-mode ground noise.
However, the 470 S source impedance unbalance will seriously
degrade the CMRR of any simple active balanced input stage.
In the example above, CMRR will be only 30 dB at 60 Hz.
If the “pro” input already uses a Jensen line input transformer,
CMRR will be about 100 dB at 60 Hz, with only this cable needed.
Figure 6: “BETTER” uses an Output Transformer to Improve Balance
This interface uses a bifilar type output transformer to improve the
impedance balance. This will reduce the degradation of CMRR at
low frequencies for the active balanced type input stage. In the
example above, CMRR will be about 55 dB at 60 Hz, but
because of the interwinding capacitance in an output transformer,
CMRR will gradually fall to about 30 dB for frequencies over 1 kHz.
Compared to the simple adapter cable, it does not improve buzz,
which contains many high frequency components, but it further
reduces 60 Hz hum by about 25 dB. This method can also reduce
hum by over 70 dB when used with an unbalanced input.
Figure 7: “BEST” uses an Input Transformer to “Fix” the Imput Stage
This interface uses an input transformer to effectively replace the
“active balanced” input stage. The input transformer, unlike the input
stage, can tolerate source impedance unbalances with very little
CMRR degradation. In the example above, CMRR will be
about 100 dB at 60 Hz and near 70 dB at 3 kHz, making it very
effective at eliminating both the hum and buzz components.
The input stage is operated unbalanced by grounding its ! input and
driving its + input with the transformers output. If the transformer
can be installed inside the “pro” equipment, the resulting
balanced input will give outstanding CMRR performance
from either balanced or unbalanced (using the adapter
cable) sources.
Figure 8
Jensen AN-003 2
Figure 9: Adding a Balanced Output
A simple modification to equipment with unbalanced outputs can
convert it to have true balanced outputs. Get (or trace the circuit to
make) a schematic of the equipments output circuitry. Depending
on available panel space, the new 3-conductor output connector can
be added or used to replace the existing connector. This
modification uses the existing unbalanced output as the + output
and adds an impedance matched passive network to ground for the
! output. In most cases, it is as simple as shown above.
3 - BALANCED to UNBALANCED INTERFACES
The output impedance of the existing output is defined by the network between the op-amp output (whose closed loop output impedance is negligible) and the output connector. An identical network to ground is then added as shown.
This is also a good opportunity to “hot-rod” the output stage, by lowering and tightly matching its output impedances. Lowering RS to 100 S, ±1% and increasing CC to 220 µF, ±20%, works well with any popular op-amp known to the author, except for the TL06x, TL07x, or TL08x series (their high open loop output impedance makes them unstable with capacitive loads such as cables). For opamps operating from symmetrical supplies up to ±18 volts, we recommend Panasonic 16 volt bi-polar electrolytics, part number ECE-A1CN221S, available from Digi-Key or other Panasonic distributors. These parts have the lowest distortion characteristic of any weve tested. The modified output will have balance as good or better than most current pro gear and, with the exception of the possible “gain reach” problem mentioned earlier, will produce excellent results in a professional environment. If the unbalanced output is retained, do not use (or connect cables to) both outputs at the same time.
Figure 10: “BETTER” uses an Output Transformer and a “Pad”
If the balanced output uses a transformer, omit the one shown and
connect HI and LO directly to ORG and YEL respectively. In the
example above, CMRR will be about 60 dB at 60 Hz, but decrease at 6 dB per octave, making it effective for hum but not for buzz. The same transformer capacitance will unbalance the balanced line at high frequencies, which wont affect the interface itself, but may affect the CMRR of other inputs "bridging" the line. The 12 dB signal attenuation is provided by the two resistor “pad”.
Figure 11: “BEST” uses a 4:1 Input Transformer to “Do It All”
This interface uses a 4:1 step-down input transformer to provide
12 dB of signal attenuation, excellent ground noise rejection, very
little line loading, and full preservation of the lines balance. In the example above, CMRR will be about 120 dB at 60 Hz and 85 dB at 3 kHz, effectively eliminating hum and buzz. The transformer must be located as shown to reduce capacitive loading.
Jensen AN-003 3
4 - ABOUT UNBALANCED CONNECTIONS
Please note that, in all the schematic diagrams, connections to the
unbalanced IHF plug (formerly the “RCA plug” or “phono plug”) are
shown as the single point to join SH (shield) and LO (signal low or !).
This is very important to absolutely minimize the resistance of
any remaining path used by both signal and ground
currents. If connections are made as shown, the only remaining
common path is the contact resistance of the shield connection
between IHF plug and IHF socket. Use a good quality IHF plug with
high spring force contacts and make sure the contact points are clean
and free of oxides.
With a little extra effort, this small remaining shared path can be
bypassed altogether. Leave signal LO connected to the IHF plug
shield, but connect the cable shield directly to the equipment chassis.
If the equipment manufacturer has thoughtfully provided a binding
post or banana jack marked GND, this will be easy. If not, there is
almost always room to mount one and then use a mating spade lug
or banana plug on the cables shield.
5 - ABOUT BALANCED SHIELD CONNECTIONS
In the schematic diagram for the typical “pro” balanced input stage,
pin 1 of the input socket is shown connected directly to the
equipment chassis, based on widely used conventional practice.
However, in previous writings, I have proposed that in large, very
high performance audio systems using balanced interconnections,
this practice can degrade CMRR and introduce system crosstalk or
oscillation. I have also proposed that “ground lift” switches be
included in all balanced line input circuits, but never on microphone
inputs (a microphone “floats” with no ground path of its own) or line
outputs.
Probably to avoid adding a new dimension of frustration to
unbalanced consumer audio systems, this equipment rarely has a
power connector that includes a safety ground. Its chassis floats
above the environmental ground, sometimes over 50 volts above it.
If connected to ground, or other equipment that is grounded, a small
current (generally under 1 mA) will flow through the connection. If
this floating equipment were connected to a balanced input with pin
1 lifted, the common-mode voltage presented to the input could be
over 50 volts. This would tax the common-mode rejection
capabilities of any input stage. Obviously, allowing the equipment to
float is not a good idea. Unless it is grounded elsewhere, it must be
grounded through the cable shield at the balanced input. If you
should have some well-designed equipment that actually has a
ground lift switch, set it to GND.
Figure 12
About Contractor’s A/V.com
Contractor’s A/V.com is a resource for everyone (the public), from those new to technology through the most sophisticated professionals. CAV offers a one-stop resource to understand products and how to use them with a bias only for quality and value. Contractor’s A/V.com was created for this purpose since no other effective resource quite like it exists. Our objective is to help our customers make an informed purchase decision so as to get the most from their technology products and purchases.
Still Have Questions?
Feel free to e-mail us at techhelp@contractorsav.com or call us at (888) 848-4228.
Contractor’s A/V.com – Technology Made Simple™ |
REFERENCES
[1] B. Whitlock, “Balanced Lines in Audio - Fact, Fiction, and
Transformers”, Journal of the AES, Vol 43, No 6, June,
1995.
[2] B. Whitlock, “Answers to Common Questions about Audio Transformers”, Jensen Application Note AN002
©1995, Jensen Transfomers, Inc.
Figure 13: Contact Information
Jensen AN-003 4
 |
|